Neighbourhood Plan

Update 2 March 2020

At the moment there is an impasse in progressing the Neighbourhood Plan and progress is effectively stalled.

This is due to the fact that between the two Community Presentations some landowners claimed they had not seen the original Call for Sites.

A Neighbourhood Plan is intended to be community led and therefore it was decided that these additional sites would be included in the second Community Presentation for consideration by members of the community attending the event.

Unfortunately the members of the community who attended did not express any significant consensus on how the sites should be dealt with in the Neighbourhood Plan. At was also clear that some sections of the community did not fully understand the purpose of a Neighbourhood Plan, i.e. it is intended as a 15 year vision for Waddingham, and not as some believed a planning application. This fundamental misconception was propagated outside the Community Presentation resulting in some residents needing to be reassured.

In respect of housing development the Neighbourhood Plan provides an opportunity for the community to determine where future housing should be located within the village. The Central Lincolnshire Plan (CLP) sets a target for the number of houses that different village types are expected to accommodate over the lifespan of the CLP (the CLP is also subject to national housing targets).

The respondents to the original village survey were overwhelmingly in favour of restricting housing development to the minimum permitted.

The Neighbourhood Plan uses a community led process that allocates where these houses should be built. To achieve this the plan has to identify and allow the community to decide which sites are preferred.  The inclusion of the additional sites means that there is an actual oversupply of land for development in Waddingham. The three most significant sites (typically >5 houses) in themselves provide 100% oversupply.  These larger sites sit outside the ‘Village Developed Footprint’.  It should be noted that the ‘Village Developed Footprint’ does not exist as a physical entity shown on any map. It is rather a set of principles/guideines (within the CLP) that an individual planning officer interprets in the context of any specific planning application.  It is therefore our best interpretation of these principles and guidelines.

Less significant identified sites (<4 houses) do not provide sufficient capacity to meet the minimum requirements. These latter sites are typically within the ‘Village Developed Footprint’ and are usually referred to as infill.  The intention was therefore not to attempt to allocate these infill sites but leave them down to individual planning applications.

The challenge is reconciling the village survey results with the potential oversupply by for example allocating all these sites for development. However without community consensus this is unlikely to satisfy all interested parties.

There is also a risk that different interested groups will all vote against the plan thus potentially jeopardising the referendum stage of the NP process.

Current Activity

A more detailed character assessment of the village will hopefully be commissioned in 2020 to see whether the NP can be restructured into a viable set of design codes that can be applied to different character areas. This is by no means certain as design codes generally apply to specific allocated sites rather than generalities.

The Neighbourhood Plan Project Team will review the findings of the assessment in due course.

 

The draft plan (first edition) can be downloaded here Waddingham and Brandy Wharf Draft Neighbourhood Plan

To view or add comments you can access the blog site here http://npdblog.ddns.net

If you would like to get involved email the Working Group, communityplan@btinternet.com

Draft Neighbourhood Plan Community Consultation

Waddingham and Brandy Wharf Neighbourhood Plan Approval Letter

Designation Consultation Notice West Lindsey District Council

 

29 October 2019 Minutes

29 October 2019 Agenda

24 September 2019 Minutes

24 September 2019 Agenda

18 June 2019 Minutes

18 June 2019 Agenda

18 March 2019 Minutes

18 March 2019 Agenda

15 January 2019 Minutes

15 January 2019 Agenda

18 December 2018 Minutes

18 December 2018 Agenda

20 November 2018 Minutes

20 November 2018 Agenda

16 October 2018 Minutes

16 October 2018 Agenda

18 September 2018 Minutes

18 September 2018 Agenda

17 July 2018 Minutes

17 July 2018 Agenda

4 July 2018 Minutes

4 July 2018 Agenda

23 May 2018 Minutes

23 May 2018 Agenda

17 April 2018 Minutes

17 April 2018 Agenda

20 March 2018 Minutes

20 March 2018 Agenda

16 January 2018 Minutes

16 January 2018 Agenda

21 November 2017 Minutes

21 November 2017 Agenda

17 October 2017 Minutes

17 October 2017 Agenda

19 September 2017 Minutes

19 September 2017 Agenda

15 August 2017 Minutes

15 August 2017 Agenda

18 July 2017 Minutes

18 July 2017 Agenda

20th June 2017 Minutes

20 June 2017 Agenda

16 May 2017 Minutes

16 May 2017 Agenda

18 April 2017 Minutes

18 April 2017 Agenda

21 March 2017 Next Steps Plan

21 March 2017 Minutes

21 March 2017 Agenda

21 February 2017 Minutes

21 Feburary 2017 Agenda

17 January 2017 Minutes

17 January 2017 Agenda

11 October 2016  Minutes

11 October 2016 Agenda

13 September 2016 Minutes

13 September 2016 Agenda

16 August 2016 Minutes

16 August 2016 Agenda